Skip to content
FiduciaOS

SENTINEL BY FIDUCIA

The AI analyst
your 2LoD needs.
The proof your
regulators require.

Sentinel is the agentic IT risk analyst teammate built for the second line of defence. Population-scale independent assurance, without rip and replace.

See Sentinel in actionRead the architecture brief
20+ native integrations6 2LoD disciplines coveredSOC 2 Type II in pursuit

[ CONTINUOUS CONTROL MONITORING ]

AGENT LIVE
Controls under monitoring
122
Agent uptime
98.1%
Issues requiring attention
16
Control IDFrameworkStatusScore
CC-001SOXLIVE94%
AC-047NIST CSFLIVE87%
DL-012DORAOPEN61%
TR-089PCI DSSLIVE91%
Last agent run: 4m 00s agoView full estate →

VERTICALS

Built for every chair in the regulated room.

Sentinel speaks the regulatory frame of every US financial vertical — because the 2LoD failure mode is the same, but the evidence systems, examiners, and enforcement language are not.

[ VERTICAL 01 ]

Global Banks & SIFIs

[ THE 2LOD PROBLEM ]

Consent-order exposure, multi-jurisdictional ITRM, and 2LoD coverage at $1T+ asset scale.

[ EVIDENCE SENTINEL READS ]

Trading venues, AML scenarios, cloud workloads, cross-border data flows.

[ REGULATORS ]

OCCFederal ReserveFFIECFDIC

THE CORE PROBLEM

Six 2LoD disciplines. One analyst-to-employee ratio of 1 : 500+. And a regulator that now expects population-level proof.

01Third-party risk02Control testing03Audit & exams04Risk register05Policy & exceptions06Incident risk assessment
60-70%of analyst time on
repeatable evidence work.
The regulatory record →Read the case studies$8B+ in US fines since 2020 — same root cause every time

THE REGULATORY RECORD

$8 billion in US fines since 2020. The same 2LoD failure, every time.

$0B+

in US regulatory fines since 2020, tracing to 2LoD failures.

[ FAILURE MODE 1 · COVERAGE GAPS ]

JPMorgan$348MOCC + Federal Reserve 2024

Trade surveillance couldn't prove monitoring covered every venue, feed, and trade the bank touched.

Read the case study →

[ FAILURE MODE 2 · DATA LINEAGE ]

Citigroup$535MOCC + Federal Reserve 2024

2LoD could not trace a data defect from source system through every transform to the filed regulatory report.

Read the case study →

[ FAILURE MODE 3 · CLOUD GOVERNANCE ]

Capital One$80MOCC 2020

2LoD validated architecture diagrams instead of cloud configuration evidence. 106M customer records exposed.

Read the case study →

[ All six failure modes → · each mapped to its public regulatory consequence · why this is breaking now ]

THE CAPABILITY

Meet Sentinel.

Most ITRM platforms store findings. Sentinel works them. An agentic system built specifically for the 2LoD independent challenge mandate — a fleet of autonomous agents that map the estate, pull evidence from source systems, trace lineage to filed regulatory reports, and govern findings to closure. The same job your 2LoD does today, performed at the scale the regulator now expects.

122
Controls under monitoring
98.1%
Agent uptime
20+
Native integrations

[ ASSET-CONTROL GRAPH ]

FOUNDATION

The estate as one queryable model. Every control mapped to assets, identities, vendors, feeds, and evidence. Independent challenge starts here.

Control · CC-001SOX · LIVEAssetAPP / WORKLOADIdentityUSER / SERVICEVendorCONNECTIONFeedTELEMETRYEvidenceARTIFACT

THE FLEET

Eight specialist agents.
One co-pilot at the centre.

Each agent owns one discipline of the 2LoD juggling act. Otto sits at the centre as the analyst-facing teammate — with every specialist agent's output cited, scored, and traceable to source.

  • 01Otto· Governance
  • 02Sentry· Continuous
  • 03Ledger· Evidence
  • 04Atlas· Asset-Control
  • 05Arbiter· LLM-as-Judge
  • 06Lineage· Data
  • 07Cascade· Remediation
  • 08Compass· Board
OttoCO-PILOTAtlasASSET GRAPHSentryCCMLedgerEVIDENCEArbiterJUDGELineageLINEAGECascadeREMEDIATIONCompassEXPOSURE+ Open Agent FabricMCP / A2A[ SENTINEL FLEET · v1 ]OTTO · CENTREAGENT-TO-AGENT · MCPHITL GATES · ALL HIGH-IMPACT

OTTO · GOVERNANCE CO-PILOT

The teammate embedded on every page.

Otto answers questions in context. Validates policies against live evidence. Summarises project compliance. Generates board narrative. Confidence scored. Reasoning chained. Every answer is cite-able in a consent-order response.

  • [ GROUNDED ]Every assertion traces to source evidence and policy. Agents cannot generate findings the assembled context doesn't support.
  • [ SCORED ]Confidence on every response. Outputs below your configurable threshold are flagged for analyst review before they land.
  • [ LOGGED ]The full reasoning chain — context, retrieval, agent, judge, HITL — is recorded in the append-only governance log.

[ THREE SCENES · ONE CO-PILOT ]

Otto· Compliance posture
LIVE

What is our current compliance posture against DORA Article 25 controls?

14 of 18 DORA Article 25 controls are validated PASSING. 3 controls are OPEN with findings. 1 control has insufficient evidence — a validation run is scheduled in 22 minutes.

14 of 18 PASSING3 OPEN1 evidence gap
Confidence: 94%Sources: 7 evidence artifactsReasoning logged
[ View control breakdown → ][ Export to board pack → ][ Schedule re-run → ]
01 / 03

FROM THE FOUNDERS

“We built Sentinel from the pattern of more than $8 billion in US enforcement since 2020. Every dollar fined traces to the same root cause: the 2LoD could not prove what the first line claimed.”

— Fiducia, 2026

Request access to Sentinel